Skip to content
AIAC AI ASSURANCE COUNCIL

Certification scheme

The credentials

Every credential is earned by assessment against a published anchor — a named framework, regulation, or field of professional practice. Candidates are not asked to recall it; they are asked to apply it to work they have never seen before.

§ 1 — The register

The credentials on the register

One credential in two grades, both open for enrolment through the candidate portal, and ahead of them the free AI Literacy Certificate, the awareness tier. The Council started with finance and accounting on purpose. Fundamentals certifies a professional's own AI-assisted work; Professional certifies the person who sets the terms on which a finance function uses AI. Neither requires the other.

FreeAwareness

AIAC AI Literacy Certificate

Open now · 30 minutes

The awareness tier: one online assessment of what AI is, how it works, where it fails, and why organisations govern it. Identity-verified, on the public register, no course required — the recommended starting point of the pathway.

All industries
AIAC-FNAFPractice

Certified AI in Finance & Accounting — Fundamentals

2 hours · US$695

For finance and accounting professionals who use AI in analysis, close and reporting work — and verify the output before the numbers are relied on.

Financial servicesEnrolment open
AIAC-FNAPPractice

Certified AI in Finance & Accounting — Professional

3 hours · US$895

For senior finance and accounting professionals who set the terms on which AI is used across a finance function — and answer for the estimates, controls and disclosures it touches.

Financial servicesEnrolment open

Curriculum mapping indicates alignment of learning content with published frameworks. It does not constitute endorsement by, or certification under, any standards organisation or regulator.

§ 2 — How to certify

One route: the examination

Every credential is earned the same way: register and sit the examination. The fee includes the Council's self-paced video course, and using it is optional. Each credential page publishes its examination domains, the full syllabus is published before its examination window, and candidates may prepare with the course, through an employer programme, or by self-study against the published materials. The fee and the marking standard are the same however a candidate prepared, candidates who prepared with the Council included, and assessors are not told.

Examination fees are published on each credential page. How certification works · Candidate handbook · How preparation and examination are kept independent.

§ 3 — Marking

How every script is marked

Marking is a function of the Certification Panel and is done by two assessors in a fixed order: the AI assessor goes first and is provisional, the human assessor decides and is accountable, and a result is issued only when both marks concur.

  1. 01

    AI assessor

    Every script is marked against the published rubric by an AI assessor, which produces a provisional mark and flags where a response diverges from the rubric. It is a first pass and a consistency check across the marking round. It is never the result.

  2. 02

    Human assessor

    A qualified human assessor marks the same script independently. A result is issued only when both marks concur; where they diverge, the human assessor reviews the divergence and the human determination is final. Every result carries the name of the human decision-maker who can be asked to account for it.

No result is issued on automated marking alone, and no adverse decision — a fail, a suspension, a withdrawal — is ever made without a human assessor. Who appoints the assessors.

§ 4 — Standards alignment

What the curricula are mapped to

Each credential names the framework or regulation it examines against, and that anchor appears in the credential's own name — descriptive text, never a logo, never a claim of endorsement.

ISO/IEC 42001
AI management systems — the certifiable standard for organisational AI governance, and the anchor of the AI Governance family.
EU AI Act
The Union law on AI: risk tiers, roles, and obligations, anchoring the EU AI Act compliance family and the EU financial-institutions credential.
Data-protection law
The GDPR and comparable regimes — automated decision-making, impact assessments, and privacy by design applied to AI systems.
Financial supervision
MAS instruments — the TRM Guidelines, the AI risk management guidelines, and the FEAT Principles — and the EU regime of DORA and EBA guidance.
Recruitment bias and public accountability
NYC Local Law 144, the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, the California, Colorado and Illinois hiring-AI statutes, and published algorithmic accountability and transparency frameworks for public bodies.
Agentic AI governance
The IMDA Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI, and the agentic scope of the MAS AI risk management guidelines.

Curriculum mapping indicates alignment of learning content with published frameworks. It does not constitute endorsement by, or certification under, any standards organisation or regulator.