Skip to content
AIAC AI ASSURANCE COUNCIL

Candidates

Candidate handbook

Everything a candidate agrees to and can rely on, in one place: who can sit, how registration works, what is checked, how examinations are conducted and marked, and what to do when something goes wrong.

Reference
AIAC/HBK/2026/01
Issue
1.0
Effective
27 August 2026
Next review
August 2027
Status
Current

§ 1 — Eligibility

Who can sit

Foundation credentials carry no formal prerequisites: any candidate may register and sit, whatever their qualifications and however they prepared. Each credential page states the professional experience candidates are expected to have — an expectation, not a gate.

An endorsement requires a current Council credential; grades above Foundation state their requirements when their syllabi are published. Membership is never required to sit anything, and buys no advantage in assessment.

§ 2 — Registration

Registering and paying

Registration is open through the candidate portal. The fee schedule — each track’s examination fee and the member rate — is opening soon, published ahead of the October 2026 examination window, and nothing is payable until it is published and you register for a sitting. Employer-funded cohorts run on examination licences issued to the organisation; the licence pays the fee and nothing else.

The refund policy governs cancellation and rescheduling, and the candidate support policy governs what happens when illness or emergency intervenes.

§ 3 — Identity

Identity verification

A credential carries the holder’s name, so identity is verified once before any assessment is sat: a photograph of a government-issued identity document and a short face check, handled by a specialist verification provider. The Council receives the outcome of that check and the name as it appears on the document — it never holds the document images or the biometric data. The provider that does holds them for two years and then deletes them, or sooner if the candidate asks. That verified name is the name the credential and the register entry carry, in place of the name given at sign-up. Registering and booking do not wait on verification; sitting does.

§ 4 — Rules

Examination rules and security

Examinations are delivered remotely and proctored by a specialist provider; the technical requirements and the conduct of a session are published with the timetable. The rules themselves are already fixed:

  • you sit alone, under your own verified identity;
  • only the materials the examination brief permits may be used;
  • examination content is confidential — disclosing, soliciting, or reusing it outside the examination is a breach of the Code of Professional Conduct;
  • suspected misconduct is investigated before any result is issued, and no adverse finding is made without the candidate being heard.

Examination format varies by track and is fixed when that track’s syllabus is issued. Scenario work is the core of every paper, and may be combined with other applied question types. What does not vary is what is being tested: applying a framework to a deployment, rather than recalling what the framework says.

§ 5 — Adjustments

Reasonable adjustments

Adjustments — extra time, breaks, assistive technology, an alternative format — are arranged in advance through the process in the equal treatment policy. Request them at registration; an adjustment changes the conditions of the examination, never the standard it assesses. A refused adjustment can be appealed.

§ 6 — Results

Marking, results, and retakes

Every script is marked twice, in a fixed order: an AI assessor first, producing a provisional mark, and an independent human assessor second. A result is issued only when both marks concur; where they diverge, the human assessor reviews the divergence and the human determination is final. No result is issued on automated marking alone, and no adverse decision — a fail, a suspension, a withdrawal — is ever made without a human assessor.

A successful candidate receives the credential, its badge, and a public register entry valid for two years — see revalidation. An unsuccessful candidate receives their result with domain-level feedback and may re-sit after 21 days, up to three attempts in twelve months, each on a different form of the paper at the standard examination fee.

§ 7 — Appeals

If you disagree

A result, a certification decision, a suspension, a withdrawal, or a refused adjustment can be appealed under the appeals and complaints procedure — decided by people who had no part in the original decision, within published time limits. Complaints about the Council itself follow the same page. Questions that are neither go to hello@aiassurancecouncil.org.